Sunday, October 10, 2010

My Baby Was Choking On Phlegm

The movement Zheng-Ming (正名)


Zheng-Ming (正名) is a term derived from classical Chinese, is from Confucius, and is translated as "rectification of names". Already about two thousand five hundred years there have been arrogant Mighty, the facts as long renamed to the new names the moral reprehensibility of the acts of the powerful hidden. Although their power was undeniable - after all, they could also set the new names - they could afford it but not the Chinese people for moral reasons against it apply. So they played the little-educated people of something, so that was very much accepted only from lack of understanding. But it was accepted. This is exactly how similar today in the German speaking countries (and beyond) will be directed by political actors. The method is the same, the problem is the same, the possible counter-measures are the same, but unfortunately very few. The dangers are now but a larger inequality, because it is now much more dangerous and prone to abuse technology.

against the arrogance of power that defines our political caste in the day, it does not help much to work for direct democracy. Although this is an important goal, but along the way it seems to move forward a single step. Our entire economy is at the mercy of speculators and as a result widespread poverty in supposedly rich countries. to reform the monetary system would be a useful counter-measure, but it has been known for over a hundred years and still is not achieved in the field. One could at many more, is in a bad tweak. But it's going nowhere. It fails often in the communication among the few who stand up for change. It is deliberately sabotaged by the powerful, from the winners of our rotten system. The destruction of the German language (there are here already some items and there should be more) was finally passed not without reason in the ways. Language and philosophy are actually the same. One can see that easily by the philosophy of the ancient Greeks, based on the whole of Western philosophy, which compares with the Indians and the Chinese. Indian and Western philosophy are very similar because they both were developed by speakers of Indo-European languages. The Chinese philosophy is very different from this, because Chinese language has a different grammar. (To do this maybe once more in another article.) Language is not simply a means of communication. to destroy a means of communication is to is bad enough. But a language is a memory for the wisdom and experience of a people. A language is shaped by history, geography, literature and religion. This is noticeable in proverbs and idioms. Often, you can not directly translate sentences from one language to another. The destruction of the German language throughout Central Europe will be taken away common sense. However, it is to defend himself. Only if the opposition is, however successful, can prevent the worst political antics.

Today, everyone knows how important education is. Today, anyone can speak publicly, even if only through the net. So now everyone can at the education involved. Often already been articles in the press with comments and forums to be corrected or enriched by knowledge that is missing from the press entirely. School and university education is now virtually held no longer in schools it has probably never will. Mainly in the network are sharing information and knowledge is spread mainly over the network are arranged projects sought expert opinions, discuss, create documents and corrected. But opinions and paid as a professional advertorial are now distributed through the network. Unfortunately, the too rarely recognized for what they are. So often quoted nonsense. Of course it is still correct, Quotes genuine pass. Often it is a sic! noted in parentheses, even if the completely unnecessary. Who nonsense as such recognizes and wants to set the record straight, could not yet point to a similar conspicuous manner on it. But that is finally different. Instead sic! we write 正名 in such a case! Finally, many educated people to point to correct names Asked how it could be Konfuzii times face down. But he obviously could not do much. But now was to change the last. Even the last anywhere in the world. No one should be more concerned with spreading false information (as is unfortunately the Adminpedia to degenerate Wikipedia does again and again) can get away. Instead of the peace mission (sic) we now write military mission (正名)! Instead cheaper nuclear power (sic) should be written now heavily subsidized (正名!) Nuclear power! Or better yet cheaper (sic) == heavily subsidized (正名!) Nuclear power! Generally, we write x (sic) == u (正名)! At least now some are nonsense propagator gone over to the highly subsidized nuclear power to be called cheap, what is the opposite of expensive, rather than cheap, just the opposite of what would be of high quality. A contradiction in the term "peaceful uses of atomic energy" would be. As can also correct any more. One can only point out there that operate all states, nuclear fission, plans for nuclear weapons or have had at some point. For no other reason anyone would ever bother with such an absurdly risky technology. Nuclear physicist at all not at all been the same.

Many things that would rectify that, I could list more. But there is no reason to the wheel (again) reinventing. There are already many corrections to find the net, when no one by the simple and elegant, and urbane 正名! indicates. For example, there are many comparisons of real and related false terms, when you look at this link for posts by baldur white rock, which has, in fact nothing to do with the bleating here. Many should be able to see through false notions in a similar manner. But far too few to make others aware then that. Thus, the people are constantly lied to and cheated. Here, the remedy so simple and does not require much effort. Makes it easy with the 正名 movement!

The Blok Zheng-Ming (正名) provides guidance in untangling the most important terms, because that is its real meaning and Purpose. Latest with the basic knowledge from the Blok Zheng-Ming (正名) should be able to learn to distinguish false reporting of correct and incorrect information from the right. Of course, for some articles longer needed and it is regrettable that not all concepts can really be explained. But the world is nunmal very complex and even a highly unreliable encyclopedias like Wikipedia has thousands of volunteers. There must be a limit of small, insignificant Blok on the absolutely necessary foundation. Distribution of this 正名 movement through the entire network could the situation of the whole World a better place but crucial. If at some point no more political Kasper longer web of lies to the course, then policy must necessarily be made to the citizens, rather than - as before - only against them.

0 comments:

Post a Comment