Fronsystem Because, as explained above, has disadvantages, which no modern State will still be accepted, that modern states have instead created a control system. However, while a mistake was made. That may be out of stupidity, which is particularly common in state leadership, or be done on purpose, it may be overlooked been his or serve specific interest groups. This can not be observed more clearly and is no longer particularly relevant. Is relevant, however, what does the error for us and how to cope with the consequences.
It's not only taxes were introduced, but also set the amount, deadlines and payment. They are obviously necessary information for the public, so who knows what he owes his state. States specified that the taxes are payable in a particular currency. The currency in which the taxes are paid is, a legal tender. In ancient Egypt, all payments have been calculated in wheat. About almost the entire period of Japanese history, all payments were calculated in rice. So far this is still a problem. Grain is vital and, above all, it was produced by the farmers. But governments that the reference to agriculture, nature and had a general loss to society determines that no grain should be used as legal tender. Instead, governments adopted such that the legal tender should be one, by a State organ, the central bank should be prepared. The central bank even got a monopoly on it.
this incompetent government created the problem that it demands of its citizens, a legal tender to Possess neither the produce nor could find in nature. The public would make their work freely available, but the bondage was finally abolished. The citizens could have stayed and farmers grow grain, but the governments did not want to have. The governments wanted and just want to have something that they can even be produced by another organ of state. But somehow they do citizens have of it, having neither the ability nor the right to produce the required legal tender. The proper functioning of such a system still, there must be a mechanism by which the state is the legal tender, that is the currency by law to make payments Notably, the tax is set, distributed among its citizens, so that the money back in the form of taxes.
so there is not a mechanism. It would be idiotic finally something (legal tender by the central bank) to produce only for the purpose to give it to someone else (the citizens) so that the back (in the form of taxes) will return. What sense would? Instead, the state can produce its legal tender, requires its citizens to lead such, but in between it is left to its own citizens as they can get to the legal tender. Some people try to Creativity, others with crime, but both are only descriptions ensure that you use other people to gain access to the legal tender. Only a small part of the people get the legal tender by forming companies that work for the state and do the tasks that were previously done by the drudgery. This is the reason that at the beginning of every great fortune must necessarily be a great crime. The system is a really stupid design!
It would be much better for all transactions that have nothing to do with the tax payment and to use a different currency than the legal. Of legal tender would eventually return as much to the state how to get from the state. However, the latter would not cause more than once and finally to demonstrate very clearly that a legal tender, no one is allowed to make non-state bodies, most nonsensical. Thus, a legal tender only out to all the problems that a country at all can have. On the other hand, the tasks that were previously done by the Fron would not care if the people would actually use for all non-tax payments to another currency. That is why the authorities are trying to use enforce the sense constructed as legal tender in many other areas. For example, is done so by taxes on foreign currency transactions by the authorities with a fixed exchange rate of the authorities (who is based in fact only weakly on the market value of foreign exchange) are charged at the legal tender. Naturally, the problems can be caused by the monopolization of the legal tender, not resolve.
States, the grain used for centuries as legal tender, experienced, precisely during such times of centuries of economic and cultural prosperity. Why do we give up? Why do we allow ourselves instead constructed a completely unreasonable monopoly money as legal tender like it?
0 comments:
Post a Comment